An artist's concept of a plume of water vapor ejected off the icy surface of Europa. Credit: NASA/ESA/K. Retherford/SWRI An artist's concept of a plume of water vapor ejected off the icy surface of Europa. Credit: NASA/ESA/K. Retherford/SWRI

So those water vapors on Europa might not actually be a thing

The prospects of tall, vapory plumes of water gracing Europa's surface caused a huge splash in astronomy—but the very researchers behind this claim now aren't so sure.

In 2014, a monumental Science paper showed that Hubble data pointed to intermittent plumes of water vapor on Europa, one of Jupiter’s many moons. Twelve years later, the same researchers revisited data from the same observatory. Now, they’re not so sure.

Technically speaking, Europa’s surface could indeed release these fumes of water vapor, as suggested in 2014 and later by a different group in 2016. But the latest analysis, recently published in Astronomy & Astrophysics, takes down the certainty of the 2014 results by several notches; the plumes could exist, but the evidence presented before may well have been statistical noise misinterpreted as something significant.

“The discrepancy with earlier results arises primarily from differences in the assumed position of Europa’s disk on the detector,” the researchers wrote in the paper. “We find evidence to support a persistent hydrogen exosphere at Europa, but no evidence of localized water vapor.”

99.9% confidence

The team was already “pushing the limits of the Hubble telescope’s capabilities” between 2012 and 2014, according to a statement from the Southwest Research Institute. At the time, the team studied Lyman-α and OI emissions detected by Hubble, which were signatures of hydrogen and oxygen, respectively.

Images from the 2014 paper, showing signals of hydrogen and oxygen at Europa’s south pole. © Roth et al., 2014

In late 2012, the researchers spotted “blobs” of hydrogen and oxygen near Europa’s south pole that appeared to be “best explained by two plumes of water vapor roughly 200 kilometers [124 miles] high,” Lorenz Roth, a planetary scientist at the KTH Royal Institute of Technology in Sweden and the first author of both the 2014 and 2026 papers, told Nature News in 2013.

The 2014 paper decreed a 99.9% confidence in the plumes’ existence, Roth said in the latest statement. But the reanalysis reduces that to “less than 90% […] That’s simply not enough evidence to support the certainty of claims we made at the time.”

“The way Hubble works left some uncertainty in terms of placement relative to the center of the image,” added Kurt Retherford, the study’s co-author and a researcher with the Southwest Research Institute. “If Europa’s placement was off even just by a pixel or two, it could affect how the data gets interpreted.”

Hubble’s hobble

For the newest analysis, the team—which shares many members from the 2014 study—reviewed Hubble data on Europa from 1999 and between 2012 and 2020. The goal was to better understand the hydrogen content in Europa’s exosphere, in addition to revisiting the water plumes hypothesis. This time, the team took steps to address past issues. For instance, its observations of Europa were taken in sunlight and when the moon wasn’t transiting Jupiter.

The observations and reanalyses “made us reconsider the strength of the previous paper’s conclusion regarding water vapor plumes,” Retherford said. At the same time, the latest investigation allowed the team to get a very close look into the hydrogen in Europa’s atmosphere, which scientists still believe “[originates] from its water ice surface,” he added.

To be continued, probably

Plume or no, Europa is still a fascinating target for astronomers. A 2019 study by NASA detected water vapor above Europa’s surface. Icy ocean moons like Europa and Saturn’s Enceladus (which scientists have confirmed spouts vapor plumes) overall have unique surface compositions that researchers expect to provide key insights into astrobiology and chemistry.

An image of the icy water jets spewing out of Enceladus, captured by NASA’s Cassini spacecraft. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/SSI

But I’d argue that the findings aren’t necessarily a loss for astronomy. If anything, it’s reassuring that researchers are able and willing to reevaluate previous results, no matter how fantastic or reasonable some conclusion looked at the time. With Europa Clipper and JUICE on their way to Jupiter, we’ll be able to refine our database even further.

REGISTER NOW

By Gayoung Lee / Gizmodo Staff Writer

Gayoung is a science writer for Gizmodo primarily covering physics, cosmology, and quantum science, with the occasional story on weird critters. Before joining Gizmodo, Gayoung wrote about a wide range of topics for Scientific American, where she was given the honorary title of Games ace. Her work has also appeared in Scholastic's classroom magazines, Smithsonian Magazine, Chemical & Engineering News, Popular Mechanics, and more. A philosopher by training, Gayoung's tendency to ask too many questions led her to pursue a master's degree in science journalism from New York University. When not thinking about science, Gayoung likes to draw, play games, and contemplate the mathematical roundness of Kirby.

(Source: gizmodo.com; May 21, 2026; https://tinyurl.com/22z65hs7)
Back to INF

Loading please wait...