Healthy mice with same-sex parents born for first time

Findings show barriers to same-sex reproduction in humans can technically be overcome – but not yet

Healthy mice with two mothers have been born for the first time in a study that pushes the boundaries of reproductive science.

Mice with two fathers were also born, but only survived a couple of days, the Chinese team behind the work reported. There is no imminent prospect of the techniques being used clinically in people, but the findings demonstrate that the biological barriers to same-sex reproduction can, technically, be overcome.

“This shows us what’s possible,” said Wei Li, of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and a senior author of the paper.

Scientists have previously managed to produce baby mice with same-sex parents, but the offspring had serious abnormalities and the methods used often required convoluted sequences of genetic manipulations, sometimes involving several generations of mice.

Advertisement

The work explores a long-standing question in biology: that of why in mammals, equal genetic contributions from both a mother and a father are necessary. Elsewhere in the animal kingdom – in hammerhead sharks and komodo dragons, for instance – no genetic contribution from a father is required.

A major barrier in mammals is a phenomenon known as “imprinting”, where for 100 or so genes only the copy that came from the mother or only the copy that came from the father are ever switched on. In the genome, maternal and paternal contributions are all jumbled together but these genes carry a chemical tag, labelling which parent the gene originated from in the first place.

Without the right pattern of male and female imprinting, a viable embryo cannot be produced.

The latest paper demonstrates how this apparent barrier could be overcome. For the mice with two mothers, the scientists started off with embryonic stem cells from a female mouse. Using the gene-editing tool Crispr-Cas9, they were able to remove maternal imprinting from three crucial regions of DNA by snipping out a single letter of the genetic code where the chemical tag was attached. This effectively made the genetic material appear more “male” in terms of its imprinting pattern.

When the modified stem cells were injected into the unfertilised egg of a second female mouse, the genetic material from the two female mice combined to form an embryo.

They produced 29 live mice from 210 embryos. The mice were normal, lived to adulthood and had babies of their own.

A similar experiment was performed using sperm and genetically modified stem cells from a male mouse, which were injected into a female egg that had been stripped of its own genetic material. These embryos were transferred to surrogate mothers, who carried them to term. But the pups only survived 48 hours after birth.

There is good evidence that imprinting plays a similar role in human reproduction, although involving some different genes. However, there is no prospect of this strategy being applied in the clinic as there would be serious concerns about the side-effects of modifying genes which are known to be crucial for basic development.

“It is unthinkable to generate a human baby that way,” said Christophe Galichet, senior scientist, at The Francis Crick Institute in London. “The authors have made an extremely important step forward in understanding why mammals can only reproduce sexually,” he added.

Prof Azim Surani, director of germline and epigenomics research at the Gurdon Institute, University of Cambridge, said: “The comprehensive nature of the manipulations involved rules out – at least for now – any such attempts to generate bi-maternal human embryos. The bi-paternal embryos in this experiment, in any case, did not survive for long”.

REGISTER NOW

By Hannah Devlin / Science Correspondent

Hannah Devlin is The Guardian's science correspondent, having previously been science editor of the Times. She has a PhD in biomedical imaging from the University of Oxford. Hannah also presents the Science Weekly podcast.

@hannahdev

(Source: theguardian.com; http://tinyurl.com/ycwstu2m)
Back to INF

Loading please wait...