In Memory of Kirill Vyshinsky

 August 27, 2025

 

Beloved Russian journalist, editor, human rights advocate, and executive director of Rossiya Segodnya, Kirill Vyshinsky will be immensely-missed by many following his passing on August 23. He is reported to have suffered a long illness, leading to his death at 58 years old.

Born in Ukraine, Vyshinsky was editor of RIA Novosti Ukraine in 2018 when he was unjustly imprisoned on false charges of “treason”.

The bogus accusations referred to his editorial work in 2014, four years prior his arrest. During the Western-backed Maidan coup period, Kirill published over seventy articles from both sides of the spectrum on what was happening in Ukraine. Only one article was written by him, and this article was not included in the 15 that Kiev four years later found “threatening” to the state.

He was made an example of to other journalists and citizens—that if they voiced any criticism whatsoever, they faced imprisonment, or assassination, like his colleagues. Publishing differing perspectives on events in Ukraine at the time was incriminating enough for the West’s supposed eastern European democracy to imprison Kirill Vyshinsky without trial for 1.5 years.

In late 2018, I was able to send questions to Kirill, via a third person, and subsequently I published his replies to them. Kirill pointed out that his arrest was being framed as “fighting Russian propaganda” and was an attempt by the Ukrainian authorities to bolster the declining popularity of then President [Petro] Poroshenko.

Whereas the Kiev regime was framing him as a grave threat to Ukrainian security, for the four years prior neither the supposedly “dangerous” articles he published nor he himself received any attention from the Ukrainian Security Service (SBU).

According to the SBU, they represented a threat to the national security of Ukraine, but they remembered them only in 2018! And this is despite the fact that the SBU and Ukraine’s Ministry of Press and Information have been regularly publishing lists of websites that were a ‘threat to national information security,’ while my website was never listed!!

None of the posts they are using to incriminate me are under my byline. These texts were submitted by our contributors, who shared their point of view on the developments in Ukraine in the spring of 2014, when the referendum was held in Crimea, and everything was just getting started in Donbass. All these materials are from the Opinion and Point of View sections, and each of them is followed by a disclaimer that ‘the author’s views do not necessarily represent those of the editorial board.’

From the vast number of texts that were published in the spring of 2014, the SBU picked only about 15 that they deemed “treasonous.” They simply ignored other texts with other views posted on our website and accuse me of conducting “special operations.” Again, they accuse me of conducting an “information war” for the mere fact that we posted a variety of opinions on our website. What does the fact that I impartially let people speak in support of Maidan or against it have to do with special operations?

None of the texts that are included in the SBU files were written by me. I’m accused of providing an opportunity to speak about the situation in the country to people whose opinion is inconvenient for official Kiev. That’s all there is to it.

In early 2019, in Kiev, I interviewed Kirill’s defense lawyer Andriy Domansky. Domansky told me at the time, “The Vyshinsky case is key in demonstrating the presence of political persecution of journalists in Ukraine.”

He spoke of himself being persecuted and under threat from the state, and his office and apartment being searched in an intimidation campaign related to his defense of Vyshinsky.

 

Freedom in Russia

I happened to be in Russia for my first time when, in late August 2019, Kirill was released and subsequently flew to his new life of freedom in Russia. Weeks later, while I was still in Russia, it became possible to interview KirillThough his health had significantly deteriorated in prison and he needed to recuperate, he generously gave me his time.

He did not over-dramatize the hell he went through in Ukrainian detention, instead he spoke more of the suffering of other detainees, not saying much of his own, although he did indeed hugely suffer from the Kiev regime and his wrongful incarceration took a heavy toll on his health.

He spoke of the radical nationalist organizations which target journalists, and which threatened him as well as his lawyer, and which have killed journalists.

My colleague and friend Oles Buzina was killed.”

(Oles Buzina was assassinated by members of the Ukrainian ‘death squads’ in 2015 after his personal details, including home address, were published on Myrotvorets, colloquially and appropriately known as Ukraine’s kill list.)

He spoke of his colleagues, likewise wrongly imprisoned for such “crimes” as writing about life for people in the Donbass, or criticizing the then Poroshenko regime…for which they were accused of engaging in anti-state activities. Many, he said, served years in prison, or were still in prison. If released, they faced endless harassment.

To my question about whether international organizations to protect journalists were doing enough to highlight the persecution of journalists in Ukraine, he replied that while some European organizations did speak of his case (but not of those of his colleagues), the larger ones like Reporters Without Borders and Amnesty International did not.

“At some point, I got the impression that they are not interested in the problems with freedom of speech in Ukraine.”

Selfless, Courageous, Endless Integrity

Kirill was highly intelligent, highly principled, and was incredibly kind in person then and in subsequent encounters.

In spite of the horrors he experienced in his unjust incarceration, he did not cease his journalistic activities but increased them, with a large emphasis on defending persecuted journalists.

In February this year, I sent him birthday wishes, not knowing he was ill. Although by this point he was extremely well known and quite important in the Russian media sphere, he replied to me with humility and friendship, generously thanking me for having advocated for him during his unlawful imprisonment. He selflessly never mentioned to me his ongoing health battles.

In an eloquent tribute to Kirill, Maria Zakharova (Ministry of Foreign Affairs Spokeswoman) wrote (excerpts):

The entire life path of Kirill Valerievich was connected with selfless dedication to the profession of journalism, care for preserving its high standards, and protection of the rights of media workers from politically motivated arbitrariness and lawlessness.

His time in Kyiv’s dungeons cost him his health. The unyielding journalist was under enormous pressure, but he did not succumb to persuasion or threats, remained true to his principles, and until the end sought to defend his innocence and honest name.

As a member of the HRC, he defended the rights of journalists in Ukraine and the Baltic countries, actively spoke out against censorship by foreign internet platforms towards Russian media. He led various structures of the media holding “Russia Today,” published numerous analytical and journalistic materials, became the host of authorial programs, and published a book about his dramatic experience as a ‘prisoner of conscience’ in a Kyiv prison.

In our memory and in our hearts, Kirill Valerievich will forever remain a true professional and an exceptionally decent person of exemplary moral qualities.”

May Kirill Vyshinsky rest in peace.

Sincere condolences to his family and those who knew and loved him.

 

 

 

From my writeup of our 2019 interview:

Ukrainian prisons like a “concentration camp”

Aleksey Zhuravko, a Ukrainian deputy of the Verkhovna Rada of V and VI convocations recently published photos taken inside of an Odessa pretrial detention center showing utterly unsanitary and appalling conditions. Zhuravko noted, “I am shocked at what was seen. It is a concentration camp. It is a hotbed of diseases.”

Another Ukrainian journalist, Pavel Volkov, was subjected to the same types of accusations lobbed against Vyshinsky. Volkov spent over a year in the same pretrial detention center as Vyshinsky. He was arrested on September 27, 2017, after Ukrainian authorities carried out searches of his wife and mother’s apartments without the presence of his lawyer and with what he says, was a false witness.

Volkov spent more than a year in a pretrial detention center on charges of “infringing on territorial integrity with a group of people” and “miscellaneous accessory to terrorism.” On March 27, 2019, he was fully acquitted by a Ukrainian court.

Volkov shared his thoughts on the persecution of journalists in Ukraine, saying:

The leaders of the 2014 Euromaidan movement, who subsequently occupied the largest positions in the country’s leadership, repeatedly stated that collaborators from World War II who participated in the mass extermination of Jews, Russians, and Poles are true heroes in Ukraine, and that the Russian and Russian-speaking population of Ukraine are inferior people who need to be either forcibly re-educated or destroyed.

They also believe that anyone who wants peace with the Russian Federation, and who believes that the Russian language (the native language for over sixty percent of Ukraine’s population) should be the second state language, is the enemy of Ukraine.

These notions formed the basis of the new criminal law, designed to persecute politicians, public figures, journalists, and ordinary citizens who disagree with the above.

Since 2014, security services have arrested hundreds of people on charges of state treason; infringing on the territorial integrity of Ukraine; and assisting terrorism for criticizing the current government in the streets or on the Internet.

People have been in prison for years without a conviction. And these are not only the journalists included in the ‘Vyshinsky list’.

Activists from Odessa, Sergey Dolzhenkov and Evgeny Mefedov, have spent more than five years in jail just for laying flowers at a memorial to the liberators of Nikolaev [Ukrainian city] from Nazi invaders.

Sergeyev and Gorban, taxi drivers, have spent two and a half years in a pretrial detention center because they transported pensioners from Donetsk to Ukraine-controlled territory so that they could receive their legal pension.

The entrepreneur Andrey Tatarintsev has spent two years in prison for providing humanitarian assistance to a children’s hospital in the territory of the Lugansk region not controlled by Ukraine.

Farmer Nikolay Butrimenko received eight years of imprisonment for paying tax to the Donetsk People’s Republic for his land located in that territory.

The 85-year-old scientist and engineer Mekhti Logunov was given twelve years because he agreed to build a waste recycling plant with Russian investors. The list is endless.

People often incriminate themselves while being tortured or under the threat of their relatives being punished, and such confessions are accepted by the courts, despite the fact that lawyers initiate criminal proceedings against the security services involved in the torture. These cases are not being investigated.

The only mitigation that has happened in this direction after the change of government was the abolition of the provision of the Criminal Procedure Code stating that no other measure of restraint other than detention can be applied to persons suspected of committing crimes against the state.

This allowed some defendants to leave prison on bail, but not a single politically-motivated case has yet been closed. Moreover, arrests are ongoing.

The only acquittal to date from the so-called journalistic cases on freedom of speech is mine. However, it is still being contested by the prosecutor’s office in the Supreme Court.

Ninety-nine percent of the media continue to call all these people ‘terrorists’, ‘separatists’, and ‘enemies of the people’, even though almost none of them have yet received a verdict in court.”

Volkov’s words lay bare the true nature of the allegations made against Kirill Vyshinsky as well as the countless other journalists and citizens of Ukraine that have fallen victim to the heavy hand of Ukrainian authorities.

Related Links:

“They Just Want Me in Prison”: MintPress Interviews Jailed Ukrainian Journalist Kirill Vyshinsky

Persecuted for Defending the Persecuted in Ukraine: Interview with Vyshinsky Defense Attorney Andriy Domansky

Accused of Treason and Imprisoned Without Trial: Journalist Kirill Vyshinsky Recounts His Harrowing Time in a Ukrainian Prison

I’m on a ‘hit list’ Kiev allows to silence dissent & journalism. That’s all you need to know about Ukrainian ‘democracy’

Reporters without shame: Top ‘media rights’ organization ignores rampant killings of Gaza journalists

Ukraine’s murder of 30 Russian journalists met with Western indifference…or grotesque gloating

 

REGISTER NOW

By Eva K Bartlett

Eva Bartlett is a Canadian independent journalist and activist. She has spent years on the ground covering conflict zones in the Middle East, especially in Syria and occupied Palestine, where she lived for nearly four years. She is a recipient of the 2017 International Journalism Award for International Reporting, granted by the Mexican Journalists’ Press Club (founded in 1951), was the first recipient of the Serena Shim Award for Uncompromised Integrity in Journalism, and was short-listed in 2017 for the Martha Gellhorn Prize for Journalism. See her extended bio on her blog In Gaza

@evakbartlett

(Source: ingaza.wordpress.com; August 28, 2025; https://v.gd/4tCg7v)
Back to INF

Loading please wait...