If you were offered an investment opportunity that had an estimated 20% chance of success, or an 80% chance of failure, would you invest?

In the game of professional baseball, a 20% batting average represents a top batter. In 2021, some of the best teams with the highest batting averages are the New York Yankees, with a .268 average, the Baltimore Orioles with a .272 average, and in third place, the Los Angeles Dodgers, boasting a 263 average.

Ball games aside, would you accept a 20% chance of success for a medical product that has no track record for success and comes with a growing list of severe reactions in your body?

A 2018 university study predicted that that year’s flu vaccine would be limited to a 20% efficacy. This was the same 20% effectiveness that came with the 2015 and 2016 versions of the flu vaccine. That’s par for the course, if you’re a golfer. And it is a trend for the flu vaccine’s effectiveness ratings since 2005, from the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) chart. 

Vaccine Science By Design

Low efficacy (and safety) ratings for flu vaccines are nothing new. Remember the Swine Flu epidemic fiasco that never was?  The Swine Flu vaccine mirrors the fact that flu vaccines are built to fail. Medical history demonstrates vaccine failure since the Smallpox vaccine. The polio vaccine “Cutter Incident” caused 40,000 cases of polio in 1955, and paralyzed between 13,000 and 20,000 children every year. Cutter Labs was thought to be the maker of the problem vaccine.  And the polio vaccine was later found to be contaminated with the Simian (monkey) virus that caused cancer. 

The court ruling against Cutter Labs opened the floodgates to a wave of litigation. As a result,`vaccines were among the first medical products almost eliminated by lawsuits‘. By design, the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program was introduced in 1986 to protect vaccine manufacturers from litigation, with the disastrous consequence of leaving the people unprotected.  Ultimately, the Cutter Incident was further investigated and tracked to Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, which was later absorbed by Pfizer Inc. Read about The Wyeth Problem, now functioning as Pfizer Inc, maker of the new mRNA vaccine.

Why are vaccine makers not liable when their products fail? Because vaccine science was created to be protected against liability, loss, or damage by design. Vaccine science assumes zero risk and asks the customer to assume all the risk. What other industry does that?

The Religion of Vaccine Science

When failed technology is protected and promoted as “the gold standard,” and allows only a few companies to manufacture products, then science becomes a religion of Scientism.

Scientism declares, “the science is settled and discussion is pointless.” Scientism runs on the engine of Social Engineering in order for the priest-scientists to control the behavior of the population through an inter-network, eventually connected to an artificial neural network. Democracy is replaced by Technocracy. Natural immunity is replaced by artificial immunity. Freedom is replaced by Tyranny. 

Scientism underlies both Technocracy and Transhumanism. – Patrick Wood, author of Technocracy Rising

True science explores the natural world, using the time tested science method of repeated experimentation and validation. Alternatively, Scientism represents a speculative worldview and humanity’s relation to it, where scientists and engineers are the priests that find their own solutions, which can only be determined behind closed doors. These solutions are called mandates.

In 2020, The Physicians for Informed Consent presented 9 Flu Vaccine Facts based on research from medical journals demonstrating that mandates have no basis in science. The top facts are: 

1. There is a 65% increased risk of non-flu respiratory illness in populations that get the flu vaccine.

2. The flu vaccine does not reduce demand on hospitals.

3. The flu vaccine does not prevent the spread of the flu.

4. The flu vaccine fails to prevent the flu about 65% of the time.

5. Repeat doses of the flu vaccine may increase the risk of flu vaccine failure.

6. Death from influenza is rare in children.

7. The flu vaccine does not reduce deaths from pneumonia and flu.

8. Patients don’t benefit from vaccination of healthcare workers.

9. Flu vaccine mandates are not science-based.

Changing Definitions of Immunity 

Scientism means scientific definitions can change on a whim.

Did you know the definition of “vaccine” changed in September of 2021? Again?

• Vaccination Pre-2015: Injection of a killed or weakened infectious organism in order to prevent the disease.
• Vaccination 2015-2021: The act or introducing a vaccine into the body to produce immunity to a specific disease.
• Vaccination September 2021: The act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce protection from a specific disease.

In a November of 2021 roundtable discussion on the COVID mRNA vaccine, held in Wisconsin, Peter Doshi, PhD, associate professor of pharmaceutical health services at Maryland School of Pharmacy, and senior editor at the British Medical Journal stated: 

I argue these products which everyone calls mRNA vaccines are qualitatively different from standard vaccines. So I found it fascinating to learn that Merriam Webster changed the definition of vaccine early this year…. mRNA products did not meet the definition of vaccine that has been in place for over 15 years, but the definition was expanded such that mRNA products are now vaccines.

Likewise, the new phrase, “fully vaccinated,” means two weeks after a second dose in a two-dose series. But that is changing to include “the latest booster.”  For now, that means three COVID doses. But make way for the Omicron variant vaccine, coming soon to a Walgreens near you.

Who changes definitions for everyone?  Social engineers do when they want to reengineer behavior of the mass population, as in a mass of clay to be molded.

Vaccination replaces natural immunity, where natural immunity refers to the natural exposure to an infectious agent or other antigen by the body. Under natural immunity, the body responds to a toxin or a foreign antigen by making antibodies and triggering cellular defenses (T-cells, Mast cells, etc). Once upon a time, colds and flus came and went on their own as part of innate immunity. Colds and flus represented a right of passage as part of the natural cycle of evolution in the health of a population. Natural immunity confers life-long immunity. The CDC recognizes natural immunity for chicken-pox and measles, mumps, and rubella. But not for COVID-19.

Natural immunity confers life-long immunity for a population, known as Herd Immunity. However, with vaccines, Herd Immunity changes to Community Immunity, therefore everyone must “do their part to protect the herd thru vaccination.”

Vaccination is based on an old theory called The Germ Theory. However, if you can say goodbye to the Germ Theory, there is no need for an injection, since the Germ Theory is still a theory after all these years. 

Flu Vaccine Mandates since 2005

Injection into fresh meat

Since 2005, mandatory vaccine polices have been deployed in healthcare facilities, forcing adults to take the jab or lose their jobs. Several vaccine choices are offered, from thimerosal-free formulations to the intranasal version.

At the time, the neurotoxin, mercury, was phased out of flu vaccines, just as the the neurotoxin, aluminum, was phased in as an adjuvant, to artificially hyper-stimulate the immune system. However, not disclosed was the increase in autoimmune disease from aluminum adjuvants, also known as A.S.I.A. Also not disclosed was the fact that artificial immunity, replaced life-long immunity. Hence the need for booster shots.

Medical researcher, Peter Doshi published research in a 2013 BMJ review titled, “Influenza: marketing vaccines by marketing disease”: 

1. vaccines are being pushed on the public in unprecedented numbers, they are less effective and cause more side effects than alleged by the CDC.
2. no evidence exists to show that this reduction in the risk of influenza for a specific population — here in the United States, among healthy adults,
3. officials need only claim that vaccines save lives, and it is assumed there must be solid research behind it,”
4. influenza is a case of “disease mongering” in an effort to expand markets and points to the fact that deaths from flu declined sharply during the middle of the 20th century, long before the huge vaccine campaigns that kicked off the 21st century.
5. …even the ideal influenza vaccine, matched perfectly to circulating strains of wild influenza and capable of stopping all influenza viruses, can only deal with a small part of the ‘flu’ problem because most ‘flu’ appears to have nothing to do with influenza. Every year, hundreds of thousands of respiratory specimens are tested across the US. Of those tested, on average 16% are found to be influenza positive.

Vaccine Failure

The medical industry has always stated that a cold and flu vaccine could not be made for the following reasons:

1. Cold vaccines fail because colds (and flus) are not caused by a single virus. 

2. One of the difficulties in developing a vaccine for the common cold is there are at least 200 different viruses that can cause cold symptoms, including adenoviruses, coronaviruses, parainfluenza, and rhinoviruses. 

3. Rhinoviruses are to blame for up to 50% of all common colds.  But of these rhinoviruses, there are more than 150 strains circulating at any one time. 

4. Due to the limitations of current technologies, there is no way for one vaccine to protect against all possible types and strains of the viruses that cause the common cold or its variants.

5. The pneumonia vaccine, for example, contains 23 different bacterial strains. Researchers are trying to use similar technology to get 80 to 100 viral strains into a single common cold vaccine, however, since 2013, the conclusion from the Cochrane Library and Database suggests that “There are no conclusive data to support the use of vaccines for preventing the common cold in healthy people.”

Flu Vaccine More Dangerous Than Flu

Meanwhile, the government quietly pays out settlements for damages and death resulting from FDA-approved flu vaccines.  According to hundreds of adjudicated settlements in the private Vaccine Court, the flu vaccine is dubbed “the most dangerous vaccine.”

Meanwhile, children and adults are reported to suffer and die from “symptoms of the flu” without reporting on vaccination status.  Just because the science says you cannot build a cold/flu vaccine that is safe and effective does not mean that pharmaceutical companies won’t attempt to build them in a lab. After all, these companies have a reputation to uphold where is money to be made, and no liability for damages from their products. Vaccine makers are moving fast, from egg-based vaccines to recombinant mRNA vaccines that were rushed as “experimental,” without FDA approval, into the arms of millions of people worldwide.

The flu vaccine may be more dangerous than the flu. But when science is used as the excuse to eliminate freedoms, through mandates, then humanity has begun its descent into Totalitarianism. The only way to ensure freedom is to focus on freedom. 

COVID CON-Tradictions

The syndrome of symptoms called COVID is often compared to the 1918 Spanish flu pandemic. However, most 1918 deaths resulted from a bacterium, not a virus. The 2008 NIH published report by Anthony Fauci on the 1918 Spanish flu states: 

….most victims succumbed to bacterial pneumonia following influenza virus infection. The pneumonia was caused when bacteria that normally inhabit the nose and throat invaded the lungs along a pathway created when the virus destroyed the cells that line the bronchial tubes and lungs.

..as in 1918 — a similar pattern of viral damage followed by bacterial invasion could unfold, say the authors. Preparations for diagnosing, treating and preventing bacterial pneumonia should be among highest priorities in influenza pandemic planning.

The name Coronavirus comes from the Family Coronavirus, made up of cold and flu viruses. But is SARS-Cov2 a virus with a “spike protein,” a bacterium, or something else? Was it created in a lab? If the spike protein causes coagulated blood, then why inject it?

Unbeknownst to most people, a list of all Coronavirus variants, past, present, and future, have already been identified, by Jobns Hopkins University, from alpha to omega, with monthly release dates going out to February of 2023. The Omicron-specific variant vaccine is scheduled for January of 2022 by Novavax, “whether or not its current vaccine works against the variant,” Moderna has its own Omicron jab for March of 2022. But none have guarantees or promises on efficacy.

By the way, variants are artifacts of vaccines, so look for a surge in vaccinated people. Already reports show that 90% of hospital admissions are in vaccinated people. 

Similar to the flu vaccine, COVID vaccine makers say recipients are not protected from acquiring new COVID breakthrough infections. What they fail to say is that in the medical literature, breakthrough Infections occur only in vaccinated people. 

Definition:  a “breakthrough case” is when a fully vaccinated person later gets the disease they were vaccinated for. – SC Department of Health, Nov. 2021

Breakthrough infections mean declining vaccine effectiveness. [See Israeli study and Qutar study]. With declining vaccine effectiveness in the face of death to the immune system, breakthrough infections are hazardous to your health.  mRNA injections do not prevent a recipient from transferring “COVID symptoms” to others via shedding. And Immunocompromised people are 3X more likely to get COVID after vaccination. So why promote boosters at all? For the live experiment?

No Data To Report

Buried in correspondence to vaccine makers, the FDA now says it requires years of additional safety studies on all mRNA vaccines thru 2027. That is why the FDA only renewed Pfizer’s Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) COVID vaccine; FDA approval was for BioNTech’s Comirnaty vaccine.  Without transparency and accountability there is only religious doctrine. The U of Chicago Medicine says: 

No data exists on the (COVID) vaccines’ effectiveness in immunocompromised patients because they weren’t included in the initial clinical trials. This is true of all vaccine trial studies.

According to MedicalXpress, “We also don’t know for sure whether this vaccine is safe and effective in different types of people, such as pregnant women, the elderly, or those with a chronic illness.”  Yet, these groups all received a green light for injection.  In medical circles, when doctors do not know the origin or cause of disease, they call it idiopathic. When there is no data and no proof of safety or effectiveness, they call it a mandate. 

From the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), no data are currently available on the safety and efficacy of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in persons with autoimmune conditions.

In November of 2021, the story changed to: COVID infections in fully vaccinated people are more severe in the immunocompromised. According to the study, the proportion of people with breakthrough infections was three times higher among immunocompromised individuals (0.18%) than among the reference group of non-immunocompromised people (0.06%).

For a more in depth look into the CONtradictions of the Coronavirus bacterium and the COVID mRNA vaccine, read The Great Heist: COVID To Global Reset .

What is 20% of nothing? An investment in pseudo-science at the expense of freedom?

How have so many people been deceived, duped, and distracted when many people have been building natural, innate immunity from infections since their birth? For those wanting to see the data, there are more than 135 studies affirming natural immunity of a COVID infection.

We’re not in a pandemic of the unvaccinated. If hospitalizations and deaths are almost exclusively occurring in the unvaccinated “why would booster shots be necessary?”. And why would the statistics be so different in the UK, where most COVID hospitalizations and deaths are among the fully vaccinated?” – Peter Doshi,