Updates of the situation regarding the alleged humanoid Nazca mummies found in Nazca will be continuously provided for a few days…

Update: July 12

First of all, a Summary of Findings by the team of scientists working with Gaia TV, Jaime Maussan, and Inkari Institute. Translated with Google Translator from Mr. Jaime Maussan’s Facebook page: 

“We present a summary of something of the most outstanding in the conference offered in Peru on July 11, however, we invite you to follow the research in the chapters that we present in Third Millennium, as well as the conference that we will offer later presenting the results In the DNA of these beings.

The small mummies of 25 to 30 cm have features of reptiles, one of them Josefina with three eggs in its interior.
The white material with which the pieces are covered is not gypsum, but mineral diatomaceous earth of algae-like plants were buried in an area where thousands or millions of years ago it was sea.
Two more Mummies were presented, one named Victoria, which has no head and is very similar to the mummy Maria that everyone already knows, as well as a baby tridactyl whom they have called “Wawita”.

Radiocarbon dating was performed by the UNAM, as well as a laboratory in the United States, where in both cases the different pieces date from 1000 to 1800 years old.
They emphasize the orbits of the eyes in the Maria mummy, as well as the greater separation of the bones of the arm.

The fingerprints of the fingertips are straight and have fingerprints
Mummies have organs inside them, so they would be dissected corpses.
Absence of metacarpal and metatarsal bones not palms or standing plants
Square shape of the foramen magnum, different from the human one that is oval.

The Albert mummy of 60 cm presents horizontalized ribs, correct biomechanical skeleton, swallowing function, but not chewing.
María, has fingers with angled ends of 90 degrees
They do not have mammary glands, therefore they are not mammals.
In addition to the relationship that exists with the Andean representations such as the Nazca and Paracas cultures among others, we invite you to continue closely this research that is just beginning.”

Strangely, Mr. Thierry Jamin from Instituto Inkari was not present during the July 11 presentation by scientists, Gaia, Mr. Maussan at the Swiss Hotel in Lima, Peru. His associates from Instituto Inkari (including Instituto Inkari’s vice President) said that he was sick or not feeling well. However, he presented some information in a parallel internet broadcast in French.  I do not know if the team has split. More information should be coming up soon. Results from some DNA tests apparently dating to May 2017 were apparently presented by Mr. Jamin while the rest of the team did not present any DNA results stating that they were not ready yet. Perhaps Mr. Jamin’s DNA results refer to finding human DNA in the sample tested but I don’t know if this means that only DNA is present. More information should be forthcoming very soon.

Declarations by Mr. Jamin (in French and Spanish)

On July 11,  the Inka Room at the Swiss Hotel in Lima was probably 50% full. This reminds me of the rather scarce room attendance at the 2013 Citizen’s Hearing for Disclosure in Washington, DC.  although in Lima it was not a call for all citizens, but  primarily a call for the press and there were many empty seats remaining. Few if any scientists experts in archaeological remains, anthropology or research on mummies were present, except for one that I knew. However, several cameramen from different news services besides GaiaTV were present. Not many newspapers gave the news in Lima the following day. One Peruvian scientist related to research of mummies came. He had been part of a highly skeptical official declaration that took place on July 10th against the research conducted thus far and against the illegal obtaining and subsequent manipulation and testing (without going through the proper channels) of what would be part of Peru’s national heritage. I had asked them in person to come to the Gaia, Inkari, Maussan, scientists presentation but only one came. 

The following pronouncement by Peruvian (and international) mummy experts from the scientific community was presented on July 10, 2017 (Translated with Google translator):

PRONOUNCEMENT OF THE SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY

WITH RESPECT OF THE FRAUD OF EXTRATERRESTRIAL MUMMIES

The adherents to this document, members of the national and international scientific community, experts in the study and conservation of human remains (mummies and skeletons), we communicate the following:

1.- For some time the alleged discovery of “extraterrestrial mummies” has been publicized in our country, through an irresponsible organized campaign of disinformation.

2.- The testimonies and published images allow to assert that these findings correspond undoubtedly to pre-Columbian human remains – Cultural Patrimony of the Nation -, maliciously manipulated and even mutilated to obtain an ‘ad hoc’ appearance for commercial exploitation. Moreover, the exclusion of the entire archaeological context is absolutely contrary to the scientific investigation of this kind of cultural property.

3.- It is the responsibility of the authorities to make the corresponding accusations, since this ‘production’ has violated numerous national and international norms that watch for the defense of the Cultural Heritage. We hope that these same authorities will seek the protection and adequate investigation of these remains, as well as the place of origin of them, in order to stop the huaqueo (illegal digging and selling of archaeological artifacts) and trafficking of human remains. We also expect exemplary sanctions for those responsible for this depredation of the heritage that is of all Peruvians and humanity.

4.- Finally, these illegal and criminal actions in a human body violate human dignity. In particular, the exploitation of pre-Columbian mummies carried out by these people assaults and offends the Andean Culture, implying that their achievements were due to alleged ‘foreign aid’.

The undersigned we offer our best offices to collaborate with the authorities to demonstrate our affirmations in the corresponding instances. We also offer to participate in activities that contribute to defend and highlight the importance of our cultural heritage, legacy of our ancestors.

Update July 13

As expected, reactions have been varied, occasionally measured but, for the most, highly opinionated, usually simplistic, polarized, often insulting of the integrity of others. Many otherwise rational, thinking persons dismiss all of this as an “obvious” hoax. Others also otherwise rational thinking persons express that authorities and scientists are prejudiced and don’t know what they are doing. Many simply state that the mummies are “obviously” non-human and or extraterrestrials. However, the scientists that have conducted the research have not stated that they are extraterrestrials. Many criticize the authorities for not responding faster, whether they want them to protect the remains, or allow for further research. Many persons side against Jaime Maussan and don’t want to consider anything that he presents. Others are suspicious of authorities and accuse them of hiding or preventing the truth from coming out. partial news are taken to strongly held attitudes. The evidence and circumstances are cognitively processed according to strong personal preferences. 

The reasons why Mr. Thierry Jamin didn’t participate with the rest of the team including Gaia TV, Mr. Maussan and the scientists were apparently form-based and not content-based. They were explained by Mr. Jamin in French in an interview with Nurea TV. Many thanks for Mrs. Claudine Varesi’s translation.

At NureaTV yesterday Thierry Jamin explained his reasons for separating from Maussan and GAIA, for differences and in what they had agreed, Jamin expresses great frustration and even ‘anger’ in his own words, unfortunately it is in French without subtitles.

Indeed, in this video Jamin (min 00:11) states that on Friday (July 7) they met with the team Gaia and Maussan with whom he was going to present at the Swisshotel, to meet with the unpleasant surprise that the plan they had decided to follow through with the plan as well as the agreements of collaboration they had established had not been respected, having proceeded at the presentation of the event without first consulting with Jamin to whom this seemed unacceptable.  So, despite of the anger that this caused him he decided not to participate in things that were not within the criteria of Inkari Institute … his friends at the Inkari Institute, Jose Casablanca and Dr Edson and (?) were much more diplomatic than he and went to the Swisshotel “calming the situation a bit” while he preferred to abstain from participating to avoid any trouble. (At 16:00 min of the video he mentions something about “interests” that do not agree with Inkari’s principles).

Jamin emphasizes the excellent work and professional diagnoses performed by Dr José Jesús Zalce Benitez (at min. 18:00) on Dr. Edson, who has been with him since the founding of Inkari, performing a very thorough job and he hoped that the detractors would hope pay more attention to what he has to say. (He also mentioned) the biologist Jose de la Cruz Rios, an excellent professional and friend, who made the discovery and analysis of Josefina’s eggs.

(In the video) there were mentions of the Russian Korotov, professor of the University of Saint Petersburg, a good researcher who conducted much work on ‘Maria’, as well as geneticist Michael Aseev, PhD. According to Jamin, the first encounter with the “huaqueros” (unofficial grave diggers for commercial purposes) was in January 2017 in La Paz, Bolivia.

Inkari wants to share the tomographies with the whole world for free for the investigations to continue, being its main objective is to determine if it (the case) is authentic or false and Dr. Edson Salazar asks the scientific community to help in confirm this since there are anatomical parameters that leave doubts, although as far as the skull and thorax body and limbs are concerned, these (parameters) are completely harmonic, while the debate centers upon the hands and feet, although until now no internal or external modifications have been found.

The general feeling of Dr. Edson Salazar in these 8 months of work is that he foresees many more years of research, since there are questions that have no answer, and is no longer one or two scientists, but (asks that) the entire scientific community to collaborate with their contributions and their studies to arrive at a final conclusion based on evidences (even if perhaps in that they differ of Maussan and Gaia’s that have already qualified them as ETs). Dr. Edson Salazar said that his has to be studied in universities of the highest level and that they are completely disposed to collaborate for this. Furthermore, they agree that, if there has been any kind of modification (of the mummies), the authors should be punished rigorously. Now, if it was the Nazcas who made the modifications, then that would entail a (greater) appreciation of that culture, perhaps (pertaining) to a cult or a relationship with these beings if it is verified that they are ancient and that some (of the samples) have been modified in ancient times.

French interlocutors ask: in the hypothesis that they have been constructed, especially Maria, how was it was done? So far it is impossible to verify such thing because of the perfection of the body in its harmony of parts.

Although a journalist from Panamericana Television attended the conference at Swiss Hotel, in what sounds to me like an alarming and tendentious report, on July 12 the TV network produced a not well-informed note beginning with the sentence “Mexicans that Announced the Finding of Extraterrestrial Mummies are Denounced”  A local medical anthropologist is interviewed and he mentions that the proper procedures were not followed. However, part of some declarations and arguments by Mr. Maussan were also included. The note states that “‘perhaps to avoid responsibilities,'”  Mexican journalist Jaime Maussan, conductor of the Tercer Milenio program stated that they had tried to coordinate with our government several times this discovery, a request that was not attended.”

Another link: http://tinyurl.com/ybrhjlam

In the website “Nuestro Pasado Extraterrestre” (and in his Facebook account) journalist, researcher Marco Barraza showed that Mr. Jamin had also reported in an interview with Nurea TV about the results obtained in May, 2017 of some DNA analysis. The following translation into Spanish is in Mr. Barraza’s web site. I translated it again into English.

That the study of 2 specific samples was already publicly known:

1. Remnants of unknown tissue, eventually from brain biomaterials.
2. Bone and tissue taken from the side of a hand (possibly non-human).

The conclusions for both samples are as follows:

THE DNA SEQUENCE IS PRODUCED FROM BIOLOGICAL MATERIAL OF BRAIN IN A SKULL (1). THE CLOSEST BRANCH IN THE SEQUENCE OF 16s IS LEGIBLE USING A BASE OF GENETIC DATA, A BASIC TOOL FOR RESEARCHING DATA OF NUCLEOTIDES TOTAL ALIGNMENT, WHERE A BRANCH HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED AS 100% HOMO SAPIENS (HUMAN).

The combination of the replication of the obtained samples, the procedures in the place of sterilization in the lab and the elimination of AND profiles from the lab suggest that the results ARE AUTHENTIC and that that do not have any contamination.

The results of this analysis were dated May 4, 2017 and obtained in the University of Lakehead in Ontario, Canada. The scientist in charge and signing the report is Stephen Frapietro, Technichal Director of the Paleo DNA Laboratory in the University of Lakehead.

Jamin obtained the DNA of his samples in examinations he performed in a parallel manner to the “MexicoSouthAmerican research team” and argued that he made this known because he was surprised about the little objectivity (he met) about communicating the scientific progress achieved. 

(I hope I’m able to obtain a clearer image)

Use source link below to view documentation.

Note accompanying a video in French (translated into English with Google translator). Link to Nuria TV ‘s video “Reliques du Pérou: Les Explications Officielles avec T. Jamin, le Dc Edson e M. Ribardiére.”

The team of Alien Project having separated from Jaime Maussan and Gaïa, we organize an interview with Thierry Jamin and Michel Ribardière on the sidelines of the official “Disclosure” conference at 8 pm (French time) on Nuréa TV. We explain this new direction and of course talk about the “Relics of Peru”.

IMPORTANT:

Always anxious to provide you with as much reliable information as possible on this issue, we have just published on www.nurea.tv, with the agreement of the Alien Project team, the pdf of the first official laboratory analysis reports (And their translation) that they had already authorized us to broadcast to you exclusively on the last show.

– Regarding DNA analyzes, although the Alien Project / Inkari Cusco team sent samples for analysis to various laboratories at the same time, only the “Paleo DNA Laboratory” (Canada) Proposed to carry out these analyzes free of charge, has already communicated the results of a full analysis.

– The Alien Project / Inkari Cusco team is still awaiting numerous results concerning analysis entrusted to several laboratories in the world.

We thank the Alien Project team for sending us these documents and for their transparency in the management of this file.

Commentary: Perhaps Alien Project/Instituto Inkari wanted to present some DNA findings but the rest of the team Gaia TV, Maussan and other collaborators wanted to wait and present their preliminary findings first. I will try to find out. I think it is a disagreement of form, not of essence or content. It also suggests a willingness to present incoming results whatever they may be.

Posted by reporter, researcher Marco Barraza in his Facebook account (translated with the help of Google Translator) 

We now share 2 EXAMINATIONS carried out in MEXICO (outside of Peru) to different samples.

The first of 14C Radiocarbon made to the following pieces:

1. LEMA 880 Brain
2. Lemma 894 Hand 001 Skin
3. Lemma 895 Maria Bottom skin
4. Lemma 897 Hip medium scated 00-12 Victoria skin

The results of the studies are addressed to the user Jose Jaime Maussan Flota with the number of Report 17, dated May 23, 2017 and with reception of samples on May 25, 2017.

The analyses were carried out at the Institute of Physics of the Autonomous University of Mexico UNAM from the Quality Management System. The studies were prepared by Dr. María Rodríguez Ceja and approved and signed by Dr. Corina Solís Rosales.

The dates of the samples are as follows:

1. MOTTO 880 1.1. Brain 1,052 years + -30
2. LEMA 894 1.1 Keratin 1,205 years + -30
3. LEMA 895 1.1 Keratin 1,771 years + -30
4. MOTTO 897 1.1 Keratine 791 years + -30

Photographs of the analyzed samples are attached.

The second test is called the AUTOMATIC GENETIC STRIP (DNA).

The examination was conducted at the Institute of Science and Genomic Medicine ICM in Torreón Coahuila Mexico and is dated May 22, 2017. The result of the examination is addressed to the “patient” Jaime Maussan and is signed by Dr. Rafael Arguello Astorga, Department of Immunology and Molecular Biology.

This examination was compared to 3 pieces as explained in the reports:

1. May 16, 2017, Autosomal Genetic Footprint Sample: Bone
2. May 22, 2017, Genetic Footprint of Autosomes Sample: Brain and MARIA.

The most outstanding results revealed are in the same order:

1. Genetic system Bone: AMEL X, Y (“man”), FGA 23 (“human”).
2. Genetic Brain System: AMEL X, Y (“man”), MARIA: X, Y (“MAN”).

Commentary: The dry body and/or mummy known as “Maria” is said to have the anatomy of a female being. Why weren’t these results presented by Jamin and known for some time not presented by the rest of the team? I will try to find out.  Are the anomalies such that morphology disagrees with DNA as we understand it? I will try to find out.

Response from Mr. Maussan:

Translation of salient parts: “According to reports we have been receiving, a great number of persons feel somewhat uneasy in the social networks due to the apparent DNA results obtained from the analyses performed on some of the samples, especially to the mummy that has been called “Maria” which is said to have a human DNA.  

Apparently, she has a human DNA, like a mouse also has human DNA; as we also have mouse DNA; as a chimpanzee also has about 99% of human DNA.  To be really able to reach the deeper aspects that allow us to differentiate one species from another a much more complete and deeper analysis is required. We were told that such analysis takes several months. 

In the month of May we contacted Dr. Rafael Argüello who has a genomics scientific and technical laboratory in Torreón, Mexico. He performed very preliminary analysis and told us that these had been superficial, as those typically applied to persons and that, since they didn’t have a more specialized equipment, this would have to be sent to the U.S. at great expense. 

Therefore, it was decided not to take into seriously consider these results in which the possibility of dealing with a masculine sample was suggested. However, other analyses performed in Russia with more complex laboratories determined that we were dealing with a feminine sample. Therefore, upon evaluation, while considering other physical aspects of “Maria” we honestly thought that it would have to be a woman or, rather, a feminine sample in order to be clearer about this. 

That is all that is taking place. Beyond that, it simply is ignorance, All those that don’t know anything but that are speaking about these issues as if they knew are the ones creating all these doubts, which is what they really pretend.