Constitutional and religious objections to AMI smart meters and vaccines
A California judge ruled February 5, 2018 that a baker does not have to supply a wedding cake to a lesbian couple to celebrate their marriage due to the baker’s sincere religious beliefs, which are guaranteed under the First Amendment.
In the California Court’s Tastries Bakery ruling there is much food for thought [plus case law citations] about religious beliefs being used in a constitutional fight, which I think can be a valid constitutional issue in the matters of AMI Smart Meters and neurotoxic vaccines that cause health damages to the body, which in Christian religious dogma, in particular, declares the human body as the “Temple of the Holy Spirit.” That is a factual and undeniable Christian tenet for about two thousand years and cannot be questioned as to validity or required proof. See 1 Corinthians 6:19. 
A person’s body is not a chattel of the state, as humans are born with free will and dignity, which no technology or professional disciplines, i.e., medicine and pharmaceuticals, can preempt nor deny. The sacredness of life and humanity are set forth in the founding documents of the United States of America.
The Declaration of Independence signed July 4, 1776, and adopted by Congress, dramatically establishes,
When, in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bonds which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the laws of nature and of nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.  [CJF emphasis]
The original U.S. Constitution did not sit “right” with many of the Founding Fathers, especially James Madison, who drafted and worked feverishly to have the first Ten Amendments added—pure genius, or many of the individual liberties and rights we have would never have seen the light of day.
One of those most profound human rights is stipulated with the First Amendment, i.e., freedom of religion, speech and the press, which are being eroded and trampled upon today like never before, especially regarding one’s right to self-determination in the care of one’s body, health and well-being.
During the ensuing years of technology and other vested interests autocratic entities regulations, humans everywhere—but especially in the USA—have found those unalienable rights decimated by corporations, professional trade associations—e.g., the medical and pharmaceutical industries, and the current technology trends toward surveillance, genetic modifications and transhumanism.
One of the more sinister and flagrant denials of human and constitutional rights is the harassment and enforcement of utility company AMI Smart Meters, which emit non-thermal radiation waves that scientifically have been documented to cause all sorts of ill health, e.g., electromagnetic hypersensitivity and even cancers!
The other probable population-control mechanism—as implemented in Kenya during a tetanus vaccine mass sterilization program, is mandatory vaccination with neurotoxic chemical vaccines, which unequivocally are not proven to be safe; aren’t tested or proven to not cause cancer but SV40, which causes cancer, was given to almost 100 million U.S. kids in the polio vaccine; not proven to interfere with fertility; or are not teratogenic, capable of causing birth defects. These are definite denials of individuals’ constitutional rights and should be prosecuted as such.
Under the principle of the First Amendment freedom of religion applies to all aspects of one’s religious beliefs, including in how one takes care of one’s body. There are several examples to be found in the practice of Mary Baker Eddy’s Christian Science. The old order Amish have their specific religious beliefs that are permitted in the practice of modern society.
To the homeowner with religious convictions about the sanctity of his/her health and body, a utility company’s AMI Smart Meter on their property is a flagrant denial of homeowners’ First, Fourth, Fifth, and Ninth Amendment Rights, plus infringement of U.S. Constitution Article VI clause 2—The Supremacy Clause. Everyone who values the sanctity of life has every right under the constitution to reject an AMI Smart Meter and not be penalized for so doing.
Getting back to the Tastries Bakery ruling,
The last paragraph on page 4, continued on at the beginning of page 5 of the California Court ruling, expresses what I feel can become a “template”’ of reasonable constitutional concern(s):
Substitute radiofrequencies (RFs)/sinusoidal waves, etc. in this statement: “The State asks this court to compel Miller [the baker] against her will and religion to allow her artistic expression in celebration of marriage to be co-opted to promote the message desired by same-sex marital partners,…” to something like this…
The State Public Utility Commission requires complainant to be compelled against his/her will and strictly-held religious beliefs that his/her physical body, which claimant believes is the “Temple of the Holy Spirit,” to be violated and harmed by electromagnetic energies and radiofrequencies scientifically proven to cause electromagnetic hypersensitivity and other diseases, especially cancers. Such a mandate negates the State’s guarantee of expression and practice of freedom of religion, constitutional guarantees.
For too long, Americans have been complacent about standing up for enforcing their U.S. and State Constitutional rights regarding imposition of personal hardships under the guise of technology. However, corporations are quick to act upon making certain their rights are upheld and even forced upon consumers.
Personally, I’d like to see some sharp attorney(s) file a huge class action lawsuit against all those who are denying humans of their unalienable rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. By the way, we should include chemtrails in that, too!